
Dear readers,
Time for a bit of assessment. I have kept up this picture blog for a good while now but I have good statistics only for a year (since 1 May 2007). However, that goes long way.
The pattern of visitors has been constant over the year - between zero and five visitors a day (average visits about 2/day). The total number of visits during the year is 536 shared between 154 unique visitors (unique computers to be precise). The great majority of visits are Swedish (86 %), followed by visitors from United Kingdom and USA (6 %). A couple of visits from France, plus some odd ones from other European countries. Most of the visitors know where to look for me, and some are referred from the blog of my US relatives who are running an extremely popular blog with a link to mine. To my mind these figures are surprising high and that makes me motivated to continue.
The sad thing is of course that most of my faithful visitors (and there are 26 visitors who have looked up my blog more than 100 times during the year!) see the same picture day in and day out. I have in average 6 new blogs per month and they are not evenly spread.
The reason for the blogs being scarce are of course several, but the main one is that I don't take so many pictures and most of the ones I take I am not happy with. No pictures, no blog. And if it is only pictures my visitors look for that is pretty much what can be expected in the future, at least as long as I am working full time. One picture a week in average. Another reason is that it actually takes a lot of time to publish a good picture. First adapting it so it looks good (on my screen - sorry if it is not so good on yours), second size it and then upload it, third to adjust it so that it looks good and the text wraps around the way I want and then to upload a full-size picture for those who want to have a careful look at it (and most visitors seem to do that). Half an hour is a minimum and that is enough to stop me from do it just before I go to bed for example. It takes a chunk of precious evening time.
However, I suspect that my faithful visitors also check my blog for other reasons. There are strong reasons to suspect that most of them know me very well and that the wish to stay in touch is the main motivation, not the pleasure of seeing a picture. That is at least what drives
me to regularly visit the three blogs I follow (well, not quite true, I also check a professional one: the blog of the Stockholm vice-chancellor Kåre Bremer which is just very informative and useful for my job). The private blogs I read use a mix of text and pictures.
I can imagine to change my picture blog into another type of blog, one where I mix text and pictures, sometimes perhaps only text. More of a diary type (well, not a daily log but reflections on things which happen to interest or concern me at the time of writing). As this spans quite a broad field it might be of some interest for some, while perhaps boring for others. Yes, photos as it is now. But also what I am doing in the workshop (the boat model I am building and the vicissitudes - ups and downs - of that work), church (probably becoming an important item as Eve has been elected a churchwarden which clearly will involve me also), the garden now when everything is flowering, art, and of course books - books in a multitudes of subject (history, science, literature, religion, woodwork etc.). And then complaints, thoughts, impressions, ideas perhaps?
So - dear reader - what do you think? I have very, very few comments to my blogs (but I do get positive feedback when I meet some of my friends and relatives!). This time I would be grateful for a feedback via the net.
My questions to you are:
Shall I continue as it is the whole emphasis on pictures? Or should I expand it to more text along the lines above? Or something else perhaps?
Please send a short comment this time (anonymous answers are fine).
Olle